If you make a list of all the necessities in life, you probably would not write down artificial tanning. It's a non-essential service, and it can potentially harm one's health.
So, with how many customers it attracts, why not tax it?
The government already taxes products like cigarettes, and, now, as part of the health care reform bill, a 10 percent tax will be levied on indoor tanning beginning in July.
U.S. Rep. Glenn Thompson, R-Centre, called the tax "a high price that falls on the shoulders of Penn State students," as college-aged people are some of the most likely visitors to tanning salons.
However, this is both a logical and fair source of revenue. A tax on tanning will by no means solve any financial crisis, but it is a smart move to increase revenue through a sort of "sin tax," like those placed on tobacco and alcohol.
Thompson said the tax is expected to raise about $2.7 billion. Given the state of the economy, every penny counts.
In addition to the financial benefits, a tanning tax could act as a deterrent on frequent visits to tanning booths. The negative health effects are clear, and some customers may feel less inclined to make return trips if the price rises. Even with the tax in place, plenty of people are sure to continue paying for the service. It is a personal choice they make, and any complaint can be met with a simple question: Why are you going in the first place?
If you can't get yourself to pay a small 10 percent tax, the sun has plenty of free rays for everyone to soak up anyway.
