I am writing in response to Dave Silverman's March 25 letter titled "Denying PSAAA office space both intolerant and bigoted." Your point about tolerance is well taken, but I'm not sure how you can claim that Atheist have a right to meet in the Pasquerilla Spiritual Center.

I would like to refer Dave and the members of PSAAA to the American Atheists Web site which defines atheism as "a lack of belief in gods" and states, "atheism is not a belief system. atheism is not a religion."

If Atheism is not a religion or a belief system, why do the PSAAA members feel the need to meet in a building designated for religious/spiritual activities?

Further, why is the PSAAA listed as a religious organization on the Penn State Student Organization Directory when the organization clearly claims that "Atheism is not a religion?" Isn't all of this a bit hypocritical?

Could it be that they are only trying to spark controversy by placing themselves in the religious center on campus?

Dave, if the PSAAA truly wanted to take the "moral high road" and practice tolerance for others' beliefs; they would be happy meeting in one of the many other buildings on campus that are not specifically designated for religious/spiritual activities.

Tom Ruffing

graduate-forestry resources

***

In response to letter from Dave Silverman, the spokesman for the American Atheists: Why would the PSAAA deserve space in the Pasquerilla Spiritual Center when the group's entire premise is against spirituality?

There is nothing spiritual about not believing in God. Thus, it does not make any logical sense for this organization to have a presence in a spiritual center.

Unlike your implication, Jewish groups, Buddhists, Hindus, or Muslims won't "be next" in line to get kicked out because they are actually spiritual groups, unlike an atheist association.

I don't even understand what the PSAAA actually does as an organization. It's sole purpose is to be against religion.

Why have a group that does nothing besides criticize religion? If you don't believe in God, that is your decision, but I can't see any reason to unite behind disbelief. Is it really that enjoyable to spend your time criticizing something that gives so many people hope and joy?

Furthermore, I would have hoped that the national spokesman for the American Atheists would be a little more eloquent. Your letter reeks of smarmy condescension towards those who have a belief in God or a higher power.

You preach tolerance and understanding but then immediately begin to insult religious followers. Your claim that "rational thought" is a threat to organized religion is completely erroneous.

I can think of nothing more rational than my Christian beliefs and the idea of giving my life up for something greater than myself.

Mark Weaver

junior-secondary education