I could not disagree more with the Collegian's opinion that terms on the State College Borough Council should not be limited. It is true that full-time, year-round residents have a broader base of knowledge to make more informed decisions for the community. The problem arises when elected officials are not necessarily the best suited or qualified for the job, or do not have a vision for the future.

The majority of the current council would limit the positive growth State College needs to prosper. Many on this council did not want to solve the parking problem by building the six-story parking garage on Beaver Avenue.

This council would also stand in the way of the soon-to-be-built Fraser Center (which will bring a 10 screen theatre to downtown State College as well as full-time owner occupied homes). Members of this council are seeking to undo the zoning put in place to build a green friendly hotel, with roof top garden restaurant, on College Avenue.

Smart growth is needed and these activities broaden the tax base. Some current council members want to scuttle the West End revitalization plan. They would rather have the bastardized houses there stay run-down than build a vibrant, forward-looking neighborhood.

Making it possible for these naysayers to stay in office for generations is a frightening proposition.

People with a different view, who have good plans and ideas, must be given a chance to have a reasonable shot at winning an election.

The economic vitality and growth of the community depends on it.

Unlimited terms will limit the future of State College. Progress will be unlimited if we limit the terms to this council and future councils. Vote to keep term limits in place.

Charles R. Gable

member of the State College Borough

Planning Commission

Class of 1993