The Daily Collegian Online	 - Published independently by students at Penn State NEWS
[ Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 ]

Attorney requests reduction in sentence for Lee

Collegian Staff Writer

A hearing is set to examine a motion for retrial or reduced sentence for Taji "Verbal" Lee, the New Jersey man who received the heftiest drug sentence in Centre County history.

Lee's attorney, Ron McGlaughlin, filed a post-sentence motion this summer claiming that Lee's trial contained numerous faults. The hearing will be held in November.

David Gorman, senior deputy attorney general who prosecuted Lee for drug-related charges in July, responded in an 18-page brief that all the evidence and information used in Lee's trial was "appropriate and admissible."

Who's who
Taji Lee:
Convicted drug dealer sentenced 30 to 60 years for running one of the largest area drug rings.
Ron McGlaughlin: Lee's attorney
David Gorman: Senior deputy attorney general

Lee was arrested Jan. 11, 2005, after arranging a sale of 348 bags of heroine valued at $7,500 to an undercover police officer, court documents said.

On May 26 of this year, he was convicted of 26 counts of drug-related charges and selling about $1.5 million worth of heroine and cocaine from late 2002 through 2004 -- one of the largest drug cases in Centre County history, officials said.

He was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in jail.

McGlaughlin's motion claims Centre County Judge Bradley Lunsford's reasons behind the sentence were not fair to the defendant.

"We believe his reasons were insufficient to impose the sentence he did," McGlaughlin said. "He failed to focus on certain factors required for the sentence."

McGlaughlin is asking for a new trial or a reduction in Lee's sentence, citing numerous reasons, including claims that the court had decided to sentence Lee mostly as an example to the community and not as an individual.

McGlaughlin is also claiming the court did not consider Lee's rehabilitative needs and used confidential information while prosecuting him.

McGlaughlin said Gorman's response to the motion is typical.

"It's standard," he said. "It's nothing I wouldn't have expected."

Gorman's response supported the court's original decisions, stating the sentence was "individual" and took into consideration the severity of the offenses and the potential effect it would have on the community.

He also said "the rehabilitative needs of the defendant were minimal," adding Lee was not a drug addict himself.


 



TOP  HOME
Blogs  About  Contact Us  Back Issues  Advertising 

Copyright © 2009 Collegian Inc.