The Digital Collegian - Published independently by students at Penn State
OPINIONS
[ Wednesday, July 6, 2005 ]

President's ideologies should not dominate high court nomination
 
Collegian's editorial opinion is determined by its Board of Opinion, with the editor holding final responsibility.

The fate of the American people as well as the future of American politics resides with a decision that President George W. Bush will have to make soon.

In light of the surprising and sudden announcement from Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that she would no longer serve on the bench, a new slot for a justice has suddenly opened and with it, a new opportunity for Bush to put a like-minded individual into place.

A Supreme Court justice who is not appointed on the basis of prior work experience and extensive knowledge of the intricacies of the law, but merely similar agendas, does a disservice to the democracy intended by framers of the U.S. Constitution as well as to U.S. citizens.

With talk surrounding possible frontrunner Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it's uncertain if these patriotic ideals come into play.

During her 24 years on the bench, the moderately conservative O'Connor, chosen by former President Ronald Reagan, was known to cast a swing vote responsible for determining the outcome of a split decision on a case.

If Bush decides to appoint a person to the bench who shares his ideological preferences, a majority more likely based on partisan lines could be created.

America and the Supreme Court need justices who will not let political affiliations affect their decisions.

Their job is to do what O'Connor did -- read and interpret the Constitution -- not act as a spokesperson for their respective political party.

The ramifications could be huge to society and affect U.S. citizens in many aspects of life.

For example, affirmative action could be eliminated. Government aid could be given to religious schools, thus blurring the separation between church and state.

And abortion could potentially be re-examined by a conservative corps of justices who purport to value life.

Judges must rule based on the constitutionality and legality of an issue, and not act like a legislator from the bench.

Bush needs to choose somebody who will represent the United States and such an appointment should not be taken lightly and should not be made in one night.

As a responsible leader, Bush should spend a time interviewing potential candidates and weighing his options, regardless of party lines, to pick the best person for the job.

The decision he makes will be felt for years to come and could possibly alter the future of the country dramatically.

In order for success, Bush must avoid a political battle, choose a new justice that will represent the Constitution and make sure to honor O'Connor's efforts.

Experience is not neccesarily the key factor -- fair rulings are.

 


Send an Opinion Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOP  HOME
Search default: Exact phrase, not case sensitive.
Options: AND, NEAR, OR, AND NOT. Power search
Copyright © 2009 Collegian Inc.
Updated Tuesday, July 05, 2005  9:48:35 PM  -5
Requested Thursday, November 26, 2009  10:25:51 PM  -5