A week ago, I met with Steve MacCarthy, Penn State's vice president for university relations, to talk about open records. We spent about an hour discussing the university's position on open records, and I learned a lot. I also learned that Penn State and I will just have to agree to disagree.
In my quest for open records, I asked for some specific expenditures for the university's Board of Trustees.
My request was formally denied by the university, and I was pointed to a Web site.
A few years ago, Penn State put its budget online, making it easier for people to access.
Prior to that, the budget was available in the campus library and in libraries across the state -- because public tax-payers help fund Penn State.
The Web site, www.budget.psu.edu, has a lot of information on expenses at Penn State, but it can be difficult and time-consuming for anyone to sift through.
Also, it doesn't give budget breakdowns, just general categories and sums.
The university has a policy against giving out specific information about individual finances, such as salaries or benefits.
Penn State tries to be efficient with its spending -- it's at the bottom of the barrel for state funding when compared with competitors -- so it doesn't want other schools to pick off key faculty by offering higher salaries.
However, there is a public document called the Stairs-Rhoades Report that lists average salaries for university employees. MacCarthy said keeping salaries under wraps also prevents people from being upset about what their coworkers make.
He said he's seen bitter infighting at other universities and institutions, and from a managerial perspective, keeping salary information closed lets Penn State employees be rewarded based on performance rather than giving straight raises to everybody across the board.
Penn State is a smart spender, he says, justifying many of the expenses I asked about.
The university justifies holding trustees' meetings in Manhattan and Washington, D.C., in part by the millions in donations for operations and scholarships that result from these visits.
Also, the trustees get hotel discounts and other underwritings from generous alumni, making the trips to big cities more affordable for the university.The university has cut back on publications, travel and more to mange better with what it is given -- some of the lowest per-student funding in the Big Ten.
I know about budget freezes of millions in state money, and I believe that the university is indeed fiscally responsible.
But if it operates so well, why not make detailed financial records available?

