Matt Valkovic is a junior majoring in international politics and history and a Collegian columnist. His e-mail address is mevalkovic@psu.edu.
  The Digital Collegian - Published independently by students at Penn State
OPINIONS
[ Thursday, Oct. 14, 2004 ]

My Opinion
Draft rumors show manipulative side of politics

The supposedly non-partisan "Rock the Vote" campaign recently sent out an e-mail to a whole slew of young people basically saying that if things in Iraq don't improve then the draft is inevitable and that we should "take a stand now by registering to vote."

They also cited stretch troop deployments across the world, the possibility of a future conflict on the Korean peninsula or elsewhere in the Middle East; the ability of the president and Congress to approve of and begin the draft process in two or three days; and the inclusion of women in the draft, among other things, as potential reasons for a greater chance of a draft.

All right, let's be honest here.

This campaign to get young voters is really only "rocking the vote" for Sen. John Kerry.

How do you explain the e-mail subject heading "You've been Drafted!" with the implicit message that if you don't vote -- presumably for Kerry -- then you're going to be shipped off to the Sunni Triangle or some other future hot spot?

And how else do you explain "Rock the Vote" spokesman P. Diddy's disgusting mantra "Vote or Die!"? What could that message possibly mean?

Maybe something like: "Vote [for Kerry and everything will be fly] or Die [in Iraq because Bush restarted the draft and sent your sorry butt to Fallujah]!"

Don't think I'm being the typical paranoid right-winger accusing some "non-partisan" activist group of having liberal bias. The South Carolina Democratic Party sent out a mailing to potential voters saying, in effect, register to vote, then vote for Kerry or get drafted.

As the Associated Press reported, the first page of the mailing had a draft notice with orders to sign up the local military induction station. The following page depicted a military helicopter and troops in combat with headlines reading: "Officials in Washington are calling for more troops in Iraq ... Which form would you rather fill out?"

It's pretty clear the Democrats are playing dirty with the politics of the draft to stir up opposition to the war and ultimately Bush. And their primary target is you, the impressionable, young college student.

If I were you, I wouldn't buy it. Despite Bush's and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's repeated statements making it crystal clear there is no secret plan to reinstate the draft, Democrats continue to believe and claim that there is such a plan. And yet two members from their own party, Sen. Fritz Hollings and Rep. Charles Rangel, introduced legislation in the Senate and House, respectively, calling for a draft and two years of mandatory service for 18- to 26-year-olds.

The Dems logic is quite befuddling in this regard. Think about it: If the president and Congress went ahead with their secret plan to restart the draft after the election, you can be quite sure waves of protests would erupt on college campuses across the country. Bush's approval rating would plummet, as would, presumably, support for the war in Iraq. Politically, the thought of introducing the draft is near idiocy.

But what is ironic are the responses I got from several students I stopped in the HUB-Robeson Center and Pattee Library on Monday when I asked them about the possibility of the draft. When I spoke to students who identified themselves as Bush supporters they said that if there was a draft and their number was called, they'd report for duty, no questions asked.

But the Kerry students offered more of an ambivalent response to being called up. Some said they'd do everything in their power to avoid being drafted.

Does this mean all the Kerry supporters would try to get out of the draft? Does this mean all Bush people would answer their government's call?

Probably not, but the sampling I got on Monday certainly suggested a clear partisan divide between those willing to serve and those unwilling to serve.

I also found that Bush students weren't as fearful of the draft, citing confidence in the current troop deployments. Yet Kerry people, like "Rock the Vote" and their partisans in South Carolina, felt a Bush re-election would mean a much greater chance of a draft.

So what does it say when most Bush supporters, who think the likelihood of a draft is slim, would have no problem signing up to serve if there number were to be called, while Kerry supporters, who are more fearful of the draft returning, seem to be more hesitant to serve if called on by their government?

It's obvious. The Bush people believe the war is a good cause while the Kerry faithful think the war was a mistake. The Bush partisans have faith we can finish the job, while the Kerry crowd sees the situation as hopeless.

In the end, the people who support Bush are right about it all from the myths of the draft to the just cause of the Iraq project.

 



TOP  HOME
Blogs  About  Contact Us  Back Issues  Advertising 

Copyright © 2009 Collegian Inc.