Sen. John Kerry won the debate by stating facts? Really? That's very interesting. Here's a cold hard fact for you. John Kerry has yet to state what his plan for the country actually is. He says he has a plan, that it is a better plan, and that he will implement it, but he has yet to say, what, exactly that plan is. President Bush on the other hand states his plans for Iraq, the war on terror, education, taxes, etc. President Bush actually tells the people what his plans are. Kerry merely says he has a plan, so vote for him. I'm glad he has a plan, but that alone is not enough for me to cast a vote for him. What, exactly, is his plan? Is it his plan to make promises now and then not fulfill those promises once he is elected? Isn't Sen. Kerry the man who voted for a war in Iraq, and then refused to vote for funding? It sounds as if he had a plan, and then changed it when his hindsight was 20/20. Is that how it will be if and when he is elected president? Will he plan for something one way, and then go about it in another way? If so, why should I vote for a man who can't even stand behind his original decisions (plans)? President Bush has verbalized his plans, enacted them, and stood behind them, no matter what the political backlash. Here is my plan: vote Bush!