On a returning visit to his fraternity, Sigma Pi, Harry Eberly encountered a few surprises.
At 3 p.m. on a weekday, garbage cans remained turned over by the front stoop. A children's swimming pool sat on the side of the house, apparently used as a cooler at a party the night before. Empty beer cans and orange-juice bottles sat on the floor inside the house.
"It seemed more like a party house than a fraternity," said Eberly, a 1945 Penn State alumnus who was a member of Sigma Pi fraternity, 303 Fraternity Row. "That's not the same place I remember."
All fraternities have long grappled to peel off this "party-house" stereotype. However, the label is unfitting for the entire greek system because only a few fraternities routinely cause problems, Interfraternity Council (IFC) President Andy Hackett said.
"I would say that it is definitely a minority that gives a bad name to the majority," Hackett said.
Greek organizations across the nation are receiving more pressure from local and university officials who say fraternities need to clean up their acts and improve risk-management procedures.
Recently implemented programs such as the State College Police Department's Source Investigation Project (SIP) are aimed at reducing liquor-law violations, but fraternities are worried they may be unfairly targeted.
National fraternity organizations are introducing more specific risk-management guidelines in hopes of reducing mounting insurance costs. Some alumni, such as Eberly, have decided to stop making donations to their fraternities until members start concentrating less on partying and more on developing leadership and community service.
The cumulative pressure could drive some local fraternity chapters to develop a BYOB policy similar to those at other universities, Hackett said, although such a move would probably not come to Penn State while current students are here.
Risk management at social events is a phenomenon that fraternities have always adopted, but the idea has only recently picked up speed, said Jared Brown, assistant director of fraternity and sorority life.
"Fraternities are starting to say, 'If we're going to do this, we have to make sure we're doing it right and are fully aware of the consequences,' " he said.
Amid concerns about diminishing liability, some Penn State fraternity chapters may choose to adopt a BYOB policy, Hackett said. If introduced at Penn State, the policy would most likely be adopted on a chapter-by-chapter basis and would require partygoers to bring their own alcohol to social events.
Currently, chapter funds cannot be used to purchase alcohol and many people already choose to bring their own alcohol to parties, Hackett said. Sources contacted for this story declined to comment further about the source of money for alcohol at fraternity events.
Kerry Small, Penn State chapter adviser for Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE), 200 E. Beaver Ave., said many fraternities also follow third-party guidelines, where an outside caterer furnishes alcohol. Small said some chapters are also looking at policies that would require fraternities to be dry on weekdays. Some chapters may also opt to limit party size, he said.
Cornell University has had a BYOB policy in effect for its 39 on-campus fraternities for more than a year, said Brian Strahine, assistant dean of greek affairs at Cornell.
The old alcohol policy only allowed a single provider to furnish alcohol to fraternities. The university's IFC decided to adopt the new policy after the provider had trouble renewing its liquor license for alleged violations of New York liquor laws.
Strahine said the BYOB policy has worked well to curb alcohol-related incidents at fraternities.
"Our biggest challenge right now is getting chapters to comply with the rule," Strahine said.
Hackett added he was unsure if and when Penn State chapters might start adopting a BYOB policy.
While misuse of alcohol is often considered the source of many problems at fraternities, Hackett reiterated there are few chapters that consistently violate university and IFC policy.
Within these chapters, he said, there are usually select people that cause problems.
He said he could not comment on which chapters seem to have continuing troubles. Hackett said violations are often a result of members not being educated about rules and regulations -- a problem compounded by the fact that people are only at the university for a short time, which makes frequent re-education necessary.
Brown said he sees the size of Penn State's greek system as beneficial, even though it often makes education of all members difficult.
"We have a great system of uncapped potential," Brown said.
He said he feels that there are about 12 to 15 fraternities that focus too much on the social aspect of greek life and not enough on the leadership and service .
Penn State spokesman Bill Mahon said he agrees that all fraternities should not be given a negative stereotype and encourages fraternity members to do more to publicize the positive side of greek life.
"We have a broad range of fraternities," he said. "Some are very responsible, and some have been at the center of some problems."
Mahon added that State College's alcohol problem is not limited to fraternities, although these are often the places that get the most blame when alcohol-related incidents occur.
The SIP is one effort aimed at combating alcohol-related violations. The 18-month pilot program was started in January by the department after it received a grant from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB).
Under the program, officers are given overtime pay to investigate alcohol-related incidents. Investigations primarily target the source of alcohol, as opposed to putting more time and effort into giving citations for underage drinking, State College Police Sgt. Dana Leonard said.

