I hate to break it to Debra Bell (Letter unfairly judges 'Fahrenheit' review, July 6) or anyone else who has disillusioned themselves into thinking that Michael Moore's
film, Fahrenheit 9/11, is a documentary, but it takes more than interviews and news clippings to be a documentary. According to dictionary.com, a documentary must be based on documents, presenting the facts objectively without editorializing.

If dictionary.com does not suit your fancy, try Merriam Webster online, and you will find nearly the same definition.

The fact remains that Moore was neither objective nor without editorializing.

In addition, his use of "facts" was more than questionable, it bordered on fraud.

Quite plainly his movie is a nothing more than a propaganda piece; to think otherwise is simply fanciful.