Nick Klein's letter ("Review contradicts articles on 'Passion,' " July 2) in response to Paul Thompson's review of Fahrenheit 9/11 ("Moore controversy makes 'Fahrenheit' a summer must-see," July 1) was completely flawed. First of all, he said The Passion of the Christ was a documentary, which is simply ridiculous. The Passion was a film with a set script and actors cast in roles. While parts of Moore's films are scripted, they are mainly interviews with people concerning a particular issue.

Also, Klein said according to the Collegian, "a movie about the evil Bush and his administration is great, but any movie of a religious nature is evil." That's awfully broad, considering only two films are involved in his argument. Also, two different people wrote the reviews, so you can't assume they both hated The Passion and loved Fahrenheit 9/11. You seem to think, based on two reviews and one column, that the entire Collegian staff loved one film and hated the other, and that is preposterous.

Perhaps, politics aside, Farenheit 9/11 is a well-made film. Film critics judge films, not ideologies.