I would like to argue against Mr. Blase's recent letter ("Repeal of helmet law step in right direction," Sept. 8) and lend support to the recent Collegian support of motorcycle helmet laws.

Mr. Blase claims to be battling along with the framers of the Constitution in his fight for helmet-less riding. In actuality, to quote a 1972 Massachusetts federal court ruling in favor of helmet laws: "The public has an interest in minimizing the resources directly involved. From the moment of injury, society picks the person up off the highway; delivers him to a municipal hospital and municipal doctors; provides him with unemployment compensation if, after recovery, he cannot replace his lost job; and, if the injury causes permanent disability, may assume responsibility for his and his family's subsistence. We do not understand a state of mind that permits plaintiff to think that only he himself is concerned."

The Supreme Court later upheld decision.

In addition, a large number of motorcycle riders are uninsured. When accidents occur with these riders, my property is affected, as public dollars are used to aid in care.

I'm a vocal proponent of personal liberties and freedoms.

I just feel our focus should be set a little bit higher, toward greater infringements on personal freedoms, such as The Patriot Act.