| |||||
|
[ Wednesday, April 9, 2003 ] Letter to the Editor
Lighting, not cameras, the answer to safety
Many of those in favor of installing cameras on Beaver Avenue have argued that it will provide police with a valuable tool to increase safety and security in State College. However, the biggest hurdle to safety and security on the streets of State College is a lack of good overhead street lighting. As a woman who has had to walk home many times after dark, it is amazing how dark the streets are compared to most streets in any city or suburb I have ever visited This darkness makes you feel unsafe and vulnerable to victimization or harassment. I have spoken with many other female colleagues and students who walk home, and their sense is the same. And while campus offers walking chaperones (865-WALK), I don't feel that I should have to have a chaperone with me every time I want to walk a few blocks to the grocery store at 11 at night. The worst lack of lighting in State College is beyond the limits of the walking service anyway. Increased lighting would also make identification of perpetrations of crimes easier, and make the crime themselves easier to notice. If the Borough of State College and Penn State University want to increase the safety and security of its residents and students, as well as make them feel more secure in their neighborhoods, I think additional street lights would be a far better investment. Christine V. Van Asten
graduate-crime, law and justice
| ||||
|
Blogs
About
Contact Us
Back Issues
Advertising
Copyright © 2008 Collegian Inc.
Updated: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 11:29:48 PM -4
Requested: Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:55:01 PM -4 Created: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:41:32 PM -4 | |||||