I do not even care that the author called anti-war supporters "bigots," because I expect such remarks from someone so dearly misinformed. Nor do I concern myself with the "official policy on intolerance (AD-29)," since I am certain Penn State took this into account when issuing protesters approval for voicing their opinion.

Rather, I am disturbed at the author's warped definition of patriotism. To be a proud American does not mean that we all must follow our president blindly, or reach a uniform national consensus on a certain issue.

Being a proud American does entail that one fully celebrate the ideals that make our great nation unique, however. For war protesters, this means taking full advantage of our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

These rights are not partisan rhetoric drafted by Bush's Democratic opponents; these rights were demanded over 200 years ago before the founders ratified the U. S. Constitution.

I do not support the impending war in Iraq to any extent, at all. Nor am I anti-American. I am a proud American, and I am proud to live in a country that allows its citizens to express its opinions and, in some cases, discontent. I am happy that the author expressed his opinion; I only wish he were happy that others do the same.