In the huddle, tailback Larry Johnson is silent. He'll usually stand with his hands on his hips, listening to quarterback Zack Mills relay the play. Johnson barely says a word.
"I'm pretty quiet," he said yesterday. "I'm pretty focused out there. I just keep my mouth shut."
Before the game, free safety Shawn Mayer gets so emotional that his eyes begin to water. He turns a deep shade of red as he yells to his teammates about commitment, about wanting it more, about getting the job done.
"He's a hell of a player," said corner Bryan Scott. "He's the heart of the defenses. In most defenses, the heart of the defense is the middle linebacker. Ours is the strong safety. He comes into the box, he's always around the ball. He's always fired up."
While Johnson is churlish and Mayer fiery, they are the most intense leaders on a Penn State team that starts 12 seniors.
Those 12 seniors have been seen the down years. They watched or participated in one of the worst stretches in Penn State football history during the two seasons prior to this.
Most of them know what went wrong but will not say it outright. Many have hinted, though, most notably defensive tackle Jimmy Kennedy: the cause of Penn State's epic fall, as it has been made out to be, was the lack of dedication and leadership from the seniors.
It took a while for this year's seniors to finally grab the reigns. Sure, Kennedy talked a good game about leadership back in July, but it was not until he publicly questioned his team's passion after the Iowa game that the role of this senior class solidified.
The chemistry of how leadership works on this Penn State team is tough to decipher.
The two senior starters at defensive tackle, Kennedy and Anthony Adams, can be light-hearted.
"Obviously, [Kennedy] is a fifth-year guy and he sacrificed a lot to come back to this football team," Mills said. "But he's a guy that will joke around with you and make you laugh. You need that when you have the grind of practice all the time."
Johnson, who has not carried but instead ferociously hauled the offense as of late, is a completely different influence. Prior to the season, he said he wanted the Penn State offense to be compared to "some of the nasty defenses they talk about." He didn't want his offense taking anything lightly.
Has Johnson's message reached its intended audience?

