The recent student response to the unfortunate incident involving Natalie Paglione has once again created a whirlwind of controversy surrounding the greek system. Echoing the sentiments of previous letters, I agree that many of the criticisms are unjust and don't address several facts about the system.

On any given weekend night, you will see Penn State students drinking at fraternity and non-greek-affiliated apartment parties in State College. However, the greek parties are unique in that they must adhere to rules which in turn regulate student drinking. Member houses of the Interfraternity Council (IFC) follow defined guidelines that create a safer environment in fraternities as opposed to other venues. For example, you won't find any glass bottles at fraternity parties, thus eliminating several possibilities of serious injuries. The banning of kegs has dramatically decreased unchecked binge drinking among guests and eliminates the risk of "party drugs" winding up in an open cup. Fraternities are also required to have alternative beverages available and escort walk numbers posted. If these regulations aren't followed, there are sanctions that can be levied by IFC.

The bottom line is that college students are going to party whether or not there is a greek presence on campus. This is especially true for a large school such as Penn State. The members of the IFC follow guidelines that are designed to create safer environments for those who choose to party.

This cannot be said for the countless other parties that occur every weekend at Penn State. For this, the greek system should be commended.