The Digital Collegian - Published independently by students at Penn State
OPINIONS
[ Thursday, Feb. 8, 2001 ]

Letter to the Editor
Fine line between vulgarity and First Amendment right

I found it appalling that your cartoon yesterday alluded to freedom of speech. The difference between freedom of speech and vulgarity is a very fine line. There is an ongoing struggle for what should be protected under free speech, as seen everywhere from the rap music industry to issues here on campus.

According to the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting . . . or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom speech, or the press. . ." However, with this freedom comes responsibility.

The government has placed restrictions on these freedoms when it comes to the well-being of the general population. Such examples are not being able to shout "fire" in a crowded area to the seven words banned for the air in radio and television.

Where does this line fall?

It is vague. In this country you have unlimited use of any words and language you wish to speak; however, when in a public place, you have two limiting factors, public safety and decency.

Decency is the key word. Basically, what will the surrounding population think of you speech or actions (as in the case with recent events here on campus)? Will the community accept these words and actions?

Remember the words and actions that you commit reflect not only you, but the community as a whole. Not just Penn State, but State College and even Pennsylvania. Would this larger community accept these words and actions?

If the community does not accept these actions, the right to freedom of speech is not suppressed. However, as a citizen of the community you have the responsibility to keep the words and actions private. This is the fine line between freedom of speech and vulgarity.

Matthew Hoehn
freshman-engineering
 



TOP  HOME
Blogs  About  Contact Us  Back Issues  Advertising 

Copyright © 2009 Collegian Inc.