Collegian Venues - your weekend starts here
  Collegian Chronicles



Get a deal with Daily Collegian Coupon Corner
  The Digital Collegian - Published independently by students at Penn State
Opinions
[ Monday, Feb. 15, 1999 ]

Letters to the Editor

Division III schools deserve football


I am writing this letter is in response to Geoff Dodd’s column on Penn State Altoona football. While I do not have any problems with the decision the administration made, I have some problems with the close-minded view that Dodd took in his column.

I am a graduate of both Penn State, and often-mentioned Division III Juniata. Having spent time at both a major Division I football school, and a Division III school playing what Dodd called "post-graduation high school football," I feel I am in a unique place to address this situation.

Does anyone at Division III schools pretend that their football is comparable to Division I? I don’t think so. I went to most Juniata games when I was a student, yet I was able to be a rabid Penn State fan too.

Actually Juniata almost always schedules their football games so they are home when Penn State is away. I am sure Penn State-Altoona would do the same. What Division III football is about is four more years of football for players and students who love the game and school pride. Do the players have illusions of playing in the NFL? Mostly not, although some do make it. What it can provide is some good school spirit. Finally, the thought that a football team at Penn State-Altoona would some how lessen the image of Penn State football is ridiculous. Division III football is a regional game. Outside of the state of Pennsylvania, nobody would hear anything of an Altoona team. Or maybe if Dodd is right, we should just take away sports from all of the Commonwealth Campuses for fear that they hurt the Penn State name.

As I said, I do not have a problem with the administration’s decision, but I encourage Dodd to look at the whole picture. Penn State Altoona football was not to compete with University Park for fans or money, just to provide students at a four-year college the chance to have a team of their own.

Grant W. Hunter
Class of 1996

ITAs provide real world interaction


I’m writing in reference to the Undergraduate Student Government Academic Assembly recent vote to urge more stringent enforcement of language proficiency standards for international teaching assistants.

USG’s bowing to student complaints about perceived language barriers in the classroom would ultimately be doing those same students a disservice in the long run.

I can’t even count the number of times I’ve been had the good fortune to hear some student bemoaning the fact that their TA or professor doesn’t share their incomparable central Pennsylvanian grasp of the English language. On more than one occasion, these complaints have been accompanied by a less-than-clever I’d say "racist," but take your pick and none-too-subtle impression of the offending person’s accent. Hilarious, right? I’ve resigned myself to the fact that this type of attitude is quite prevalent at Penn State, but questions about ethnocentrism and xenophobia aside, students’ dissatisfaction with difficult-to-understand TAs raises another important issue -- life outside the often all too homogenous environment of Penn State.

To be fair, I’m an English major who has made it through four years at Penn State without ever being taught by an international TA. The real world is slightly different, however. My father, on the other hand, is an actuary, who on a daily basis works closely with people from Korea, Japan, India and Eastern Europe on pension plans, corporate benefits programs and statistical models. These people, who may not speak "perfect English," went to some of the best universities in this country (and others), and they were hired because they do what they do well.

The same TA who you have difficulty understanding now might well be your co-worker or your boss after you graduate.

To borrow the words of David Kayal, Academic Assembly president and the author of the report on international TAs in the classroom, "Nobody should ever have to face a class where they can’t understand the teacher." That said, however, a language barrier, whether real or imagined, doesn’t excuse students from making an effort to understand and connect with the teacher. I also have to take issue with Kayal’s characterization of students as "consumers." Any education -- at least any education worth having -- can’t be looked upon as so passive an activity. Real interaction with and engagement of both the teacher and the subject -- be it going to the office hours or getting extra help from someone else -- seems crucial, especially if a person finds the teacher difficult to understand.

You might even thank yourself for making the effort when you find yourself in the real world, and realize that all of America isn’t like Penn State, and that the ability and willingness to communicate with people who might not necessarily look or sound like you is taken for granted.

Timothy Cartin Gyves
senior-English

Remember nature before development


I’ve noticed that regardless of where I live, change happens on a scale that is hard to fathom. You’ve probably read about the economic benefits of the "long-awaited" I-99, and that "more residential, commercial and industrial development will follow," and that "open lands will be a thing of the past," that we won’t be impacted aside from "tree cutting, clearing and drilling within the footprint of the new highway."

This sounds abstract until we walk any part of that 31-mile stretch. Walking, we see how machines alter a landscape that feels permanent. We notice birds, silence and recently cut stumps of the 200-year-old oak with its acorns getting ready to sprout. We realize that this change is no different from changes back home.

About 30 of us (young and old, from the university and the community) have come up with this idea. Some are recording in journals. Some are taking pictures of a raspberry vine or a beautifully knotted piece of wood. Some are collecting jewel-like sap resin from fallen trees. We are bearing witness thoughtfully.

Finding our voices and power as a community is not easy, but it is hopeful. How do we remember the uniqueness of our home once the economic growth makes it into "any city USA?" Who is thoughtfully deciding the quality of our lives for the years to come?

As students of this university, we have a special role. This community influences our development and our very presence changes this community. This walking is about all our futures.

Alice Crawley
graduate-English



Send an Opinion Letter to the Editor about this article.


   





TOP  HOME
Blogs  About  Contact Us  Back Issues  Advertising 

Copyright © 2008 Collegian Inc.
Updated: Sunday, February 14, 1999  11:06:56 PM  -4
Requested: Wednesday, October 15, 2008  9:39:51 PM  -4
Created: Wednesday, May 07, 2008  6:26:01 PM  -4