| |
![]() Wednesday, March 25, 1998 |
Letters to the editor
New write-in ticket joins USG raceGood morning, fellow Penn Staters. We are happy to announce that you have another candidate to vote for on April 1. B.J. Werzyn and myself are running a write-in campaign for the positions of Undergraduate Student Government president/vice president. We have decided to run because we feel that all the other candidates are making promises that they probably cannot keep.
More state funding, free class notes on the World Wide Web, lower
Loop fares. We feel that all of these promises are unrealistic.
That's why we aren't going to promise anything (at least anything
that's unobtainable).
Of course, we like the ideas of redistributing the activity fee,
better student parking and more support for USG, and we would
work on these things if elected. However, we realize that we are
running for a powerless position without the support of the student
body.
We feel that the students should settle for smaller, more obtainable
goals rather than larger goals that cannot be accomplished. That's
why we want to hear from you, the student body. Write us and tell
us what would make your life on campus a little easier and more
enjoyable at mjl162@psu.edu. We want to make your agenda
our agenda. So don't be fooled on April 1 with big promises. Write
in.
Matt Lohr (senior-elementary education), presidential candidate Article bad portrayal of Marino's intentI had lunch with my friend and colleague Gigi Marino the day after The Daily Collegian printed a front-page article ("Class discusses use of racial slur " on Friday) that claimed Marino, an English instructor, had E-mailed "an ethnically offensive joke to her mostly white English 421 (Advanced Expository Writing) class" that, in turn "spurred a class discussion about the 'n-word.' "
Patricia K. Cole, the Collegian staff writer who covered the story
(after Marino invited the newspaper to her class), neglected
to report that the joke was not sent in a casual "isn't this
funny" kind of way, but, in fact, was a class assignment.
Earlier in the semester, Marino had received a series of ethnic
jokes over E-mail from one of her friends and, because she herself
found the jokes offensive, felt the jokes would make a good topic
for a class writing assignment about the use of derogatory language.
The assignment included the jokes and asked (and I quote directly
from the assignment Marino E-mailed to her class) "What are
the boundaries of public rhetoric that make language and reasoning
offensive? Are we more accepting of stereotypes in humor, and
why? Are we more accepting of stereotypes in a private rhetorical
situation, why or why not?"
As an addendum to the assignment, she invited a panel of African
American students to her "mostly white" class Thursday
for an in-class discussion on the subject.
Cole's article, however, insinuated that Marino sent the jokes
to her students for amusement alone. And, in effect, Cole's article
insinuated that Marino was racist because of it. Cole and her
editors should have had the professional foresight and ethical
standards to double check the facts and sources for such a subjective,
controversial and somewhat accusatory story before letting it
run.
Needless to say, Marino was more than distraught at lunch on Saturday,
justifiably humiliated and horrified over the fact that more than
50,000 students, faculty and staff at Penn State might actually
believe Cole's inaccurate spin that Marino is a racist. I am not
defending Marino -- she needs no defense. But, on Marino's behalf,
I'm infuriated.
Furthermore, I'm infuriated because the Collegian, a publication
I read faithfully every day, one that I trust to give me accurate
news, has proven itself to be dishonorable. How can I, or anyone
else at University Park or in State College, ever trust the Collegian
again?
Vicki Glembocki Changes in daily diet can be beneficialThis letter was written in response to the letter to the editor written by the Healthworks Nutrition Educators Nutrition Clinic staff on Tuesday. Here is a case where someone (Janis Betz) did something to bring about positive changes in their life, but it was not enough because this person did something different than the standard practice.
I would like to agree with the nutrition staff on one point. One
does need dietary protein to stay healthy, but not protein derived
from any animal or dairy sources. If one incorporates ample amounts
of whole grains, legumes and vegetables into their diet, they
will be getting all the protein necessary for optimum health.
I suspect Betz started out on this strict, regimented diet to
achieve results as soon as possible to avoid further cancerous
tumor growth. At this point, I am confident that she has started
to incorporate additions to her diet to round out the original
diet that helped put her cancer into remission.
I again agree that diet alone cannot cure anyone's cancer or grave
disease whatever that may be. But, is it not clear that once a
person has made a conscious commitment through dietary means to
a healthier lifestyle, that they have the potential to cure whatever
ails them? I have talked to too many people already in my life
who have cured themselves of cancer through radical changes in
their diet to think that diet has nothing to do with fighting
or contracting deadly diseases such as cancer.
In addition to this, I think the key to understanding how diet
can cure the deadliest of diseases is to read. There is a vast
amount of literature available that describes everyday people
having discovered they had cancer and changing their diet only
to become healthy again.
As for scientific methodology, I do not have enough space to give
accurate descriptions of the beneficial chemical changes that
can be brought about by eating the right foods on a daily basis.
However, I will say this, the answer to how today's established
medical practice cannot identify with the power of a restricted,
healthy diet, is to examine the origins of the Hippocratic oath
and discover that the medical profession has abridged the thoughts
of Hypocrites to serve their own interests, i.e., diet is no longer
the major focus for facilitating healing, but rather costly drugs
and technology are.
Jonathan M. Rybacki |
Copyright © 1998, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
3/24/98 8:07:31 PM