According to the National Women's History Project (NWHP), a nonprofit
organization committed to providing educational services relevant
to women's history, the origins of the month lie in the absence
of women's history in school curriculums, along with a void in
the general public consciousness.
In an effort to remedy this situation, the Education Task Force
of Sonoma County (California) Commission on the Status of Women
initiated a Women's History Week in 1978.
The initiation of the week spawned greater interest in women's
history. Eventually, organizations and community groups across
the country began lobbying for the week to span the entire month
of March.
In 1987, Women's History Month was born.
"I think that it raises awareness. It is also a tool for
education," said Sheila Schlaupitz (senior-administration
of justice and English). "It's particularly important in
an educational institution. We have a high degree of social interaction.
All of that facilitates dialogue."
Jen McCartney (senior-accounting) said the month helps her to
realize bonds with women in the past.
"I think it's very significant especially to recognize women
nowadays," she said. "I think it's important to reflect
on those women who started everything for us."
Aside from recognizing women, the month is also instrumental in
providing women with inspiration and incentives to continue making
valuable contributions to society, said Joe Zaczyk (sophomore-business
administration).
Moreover, the significance of Women's History Month has been compared
to that of Black History Month, said Michael Johnson, associate
professor of sociology, women's studies and African-American studies.
The two months mirror one another as underrepresented portions
of mainstream history, he said.
"It's significance is similar to that of Black History Month
-- to identify the history that's missing in mainstream presentations
of history, to remind people about the history they have forgotten
or never learned," he said.
Some University women said the month is significant, and expressed
a need for increased awareness.
Schlaupitz was reluctant to label Women's History Month as a panacea
for the woes of women, but said it was a start.
Courtney Dietz (freshman-engineering) explained that the month
is definitely positive, but that in itself is not enough. She
further addressed the month's lack of recognition in the American
media.
"I think it's a start," said Melanie Freeman (freshman-premedicine).
"I don't think it's doing as much good as it's meant to,"
she said.
|