| |
![]() Thursday, March 5, 1998 |
Students dispute need for mandatory freshman seminarBy ELISA SCHEMENTCollegian Staff Writer
She decided on her major, found her adviser and met her boyfriend
in her freshman seminar, said Caroline Casagrande, Undergraduate
Student Government senator. The University Faculty Senate's new General Education Recommendation No. 1, which mandates that all University freshmen take a seminar starting Summer Session 1999, makes the University's ever-growing campuses seem smaller, Casagrande (junior-international politics) said. |
| "There's
been enough research from other universities that have found that
(freshman seminars are) a beneficial component of undergraduate
education." - Ingrid Blood, a member of the general education implementation committee |
Students entering a University of more than 40,000 people will
benefit from a class with at most 20 other people led by a tenure-track
faculty member, she said.
"I really think this is just moving in the right direction,
to getting professors back to being accessible to students,"
Casagrande said.
The recommendation states each college must develop its own seminar,
which may vary from one to three credits. The legislation intends
to provide students with an academic discussion class early in
their college careers, and inform them of available University
resources, said Spiro Stefanou, the assistant director of Schreyer
Institute.
Because of the vagueness in the recommendation, and the mandatory
requirement, USG Academic Assembly member Emily Freeman said she
does not think the freshman seminars will really serve students.
Like Casagrande, Freeman (sophomore-international politics) said
she took a seminar her first year and still maintains close contact
with her classmates and professor. She said she attended a Christmas
party at her professor's home. "If colleges are going to offer a freshman seminar that sounds like it'll be fun and beneficial then students will want to take it," she said. |
Seminar committee suggestion |
But unlike Casagrande, Freeman said she believes with mandatory
seminars, colleges will have no incentive to maintain innovative
teaching because students will have to enroll.
If the seminars are optional, some students would elect out of
the them, missing an opportunity to receive intimate academic
attention within their first three semesters of study, said Ingrid
Blood, a member of the general education implementation committee.
Faculty committees have researched general education for the past
two years, Blood said. The implementation of the seminars will
require additional resources, she added. There are no official
releases on intended new faculty hires or budget increases to
allow colleges to provide for the class increases.
A faculty senate report, however, said the seminars will require
an "upper-limit indicator" of $900,000. "When you come to a new situation, how do you know whether it's going to help you or not?" Blood said. "There's been enough research from other universities that have found that (freshman seminars are) a beneficial component of undergraduate education." |
Copyright © 1998, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
3/4/98 11:13:42 PM