Student takes selective prosecution claim to judge
Student who claims he is being selectively prosecuted on charges
of drug possession may be raising the first instance of it in
Centre County.
By EMILY REHRING
Collegian Staff Writer
Recent marijuana-related events have sparked a defense strategy
for Robert L. Fix that has never been used before in Centre County,
according to the district attorney.
Claiming he is being prosecuted for a crime while others are not,
Fix (sophomore-chemistry) soon will attempt to convince a Centre
County judge that he is being singled out for charges of drug
possession, a defense known as selective prosecution.
Selective prosecution is a relatively new term for this region,
said Ray Gricar, Centre County district attorney.
"I have never even heard the term used in Centre County,"
Gricar said.
David Crowley, Fix's attorney and chief public defender, said
he also has never been a part of a case using a plea of selective
prosecution.
Fix was arrested Dec. 15 by the State College Police Department
for possessing a small amount of marijuana and drug paraphernalia
in his apartment. He is accusing the district attorney's office
and area police forces of being selective in their arrests and
prosecutions of marijuana cases.
Fix cites the case of Professor Emeritus Julian Heicklen, the
professor who has smoked a "joint" in front of the University
Gates three times in the past four weeks and has not been charged
for drug possession. Heicklen said he will smoke again this Thursday.
Fix also cites the case of Alan Gordon in which the charges of
drug possession brought against him were dropped.
Gordon turned himself into the office of the district justice,
1524 W. College Ave., with a box of marijuana plants and seedlings
in July 1997.
The commonwealth did not prosecute Gordon, said Stephen Sloane,
an assistant district attorney for Centre County at the time,
because Gordon's case would be an outlet for Gordon to spread
his political views on marijuana.
Unlike Fix and Gordon, Heicklen smoked his alleged "joints"
in an area under the jurisdiction of University Police Services,
not State College police. Also, University police said none of
Heicklen's "joints" contained marijuana.
To enter the plea of selective prosecution, the defendant must
file a pretrial complaint with the Court of Common Pleas, Crowley
said. The judge then determines if the defendant has been selectively
prosecuted.
In general, if the defendant and his attorney are successful in
proving selective prosecution, the charges are dismissed, Crowley
said.
However, the term does not have a clear definition, Gricar said.
"The term can't be looked up in the Pennsylvania criminal
statutes," Gricar said. "It's an odd concept, but (Fix)
can certainly try something new."
The basis for filing the plea results from a defendant feeling
he or she has been singled out in the district attorney's prosecution
of cases, Crowley said.
The process to prove selective prosecution is not easy, Crowley
said.
"Simply showing that someone else did (the crime) is not
enough," Crowley said.
"Every instance where a criminal is prosecuted is based on
the law, the differences in each case account for decisions to
prosecute or not prosecute," Gricar said.
Crowley said election finance cases are the most common instances
of using this plea. These cases involve one candidate accepting
illegal funds and being prosecuted for it while claiming the other
candidate is doing the same without being prosecuted, Crowley
said.
Heicklen said he does not support drug use but said he does believe
the law should be enforced uniformly.
"I am not in support of Fix, but I am opposing the district
attorney prosecuting him," Heicklen said, adding that he
is not a drug advocate but he believes it is not government's
business to put people in jail for possessing drugs.
|