Because of the nature in which this loan program is funded, only
10 percent of the University's funding for the program is allocated
by the federal government. The remaining money comes from a revolving
fund made up of interest and loan payments. This means about 55
students at the University will be affected by the cut.
While it is true that the number of students affected by this
cut is marginal, this may start a negative trend.
Clinton has previously hailed his efforts to make higher education
more affordable for families across the country. Any cuts to this
vital loan program are contradictory to his push to achieve that
goal.
Though both state and federal grant programs have been growing
in recent years, we must not overlook how vital loans are to easing
the burden of paying for college.
As it stands, grants are secure for many students and loans are
an easy and affordable way to offset high tuition costs.
Clinton has said "education is our highest priority"
and it can be agreed that education is one of the most important
issues facing our nation. That is why cutting programs that make
education more readily available contradicts Clinton's own goals.
We strongly hope that this action does not start a trend in reducing
the availability of higher education and offset everything the
president has done to make college more affordable.
As tuition costs across the country continue to rise, we have
the opportunity to act now. We must not allow any further cuts
to programs that give everyone the opportunity to continue their
educational pursuits.
|