| Letters to the editor
Cloning would end sense of individuality
The first thing I think of when I hear about human cloning is
how detrimental it would be to a person's individuality and identity.
I am an identical twin, the closest thing to a human clone (yet
far from it in some aspects). Growing up as a twin was difficult.
I remember being on roll calls for field trips in elementary school
and always being called as "The Bugiski's," not "Kari"
and "Jennifer."
To some of you this seems like no big deal, but as little things
like this built up over the years, I felt like I wasn't my own
person. I still, to this day, struggle with comparing myself to
her and finding my uniqueness.
I could not even fathom how much more difficult it would be for
a person who is cloned -- being the exact replica of someone else
-- to find the special and individual qualities of him or herself.
Kari Bugiski
senior-public relations
Others should join fight against Act 199
The Daily Collegian is to be commended for its recent decision
to publish weekly drink specials from State College bars in its
news section.
It's an embarrassment that the state Legislature has passed Act
199, a law that prohibits bars from advertising drink prices in
college newspapers. It's not only a blatant First Amendment violation,
but it's a law that unfairly targets college newspapers.
Any attempt to censor speech sets a dangerous precedent; today
it's drink prices, tomorrow it could be radical political ideas.
I challenge the College of Communications faculty and the University
administration to stand up for Pennsylvania college newspapers'
rights to publish alcohol prices in advertisements. Those two
bodies should use their contacts and resources to pressure the
state Legislature to repeal Act 199.
For now, students who are 21 or older should support the Collegian's
stance and the First Amendment by making sure they let bar owners
know they read about drink specials in the Collegian.
Jason Alt
1996-97 Daily Collegian editor in chief
|