A new zoning district may replace the residential-office district
now found in some sections of the Highlands area. This new district
would set stricter development standards on new buildings in the
area.
Building height would have to be within 20 percent of the average
height of adjacent buildings with a maximum height of 35 feet.
In addition, maximum lot coverage for buildings or other structures
is restricted to 30 percent of the lot.
Also, there could be some rezoning in the Highlands area to create
additional R-2 districts. R-2 districts allow for one- or two-person
person dwellings where two unrelated people live, in addition
to single-family dwellings.
State College Borough Planning Commission Chairman Drew Hyman
said the borough's planning commission proposed these changes
in the zoning ordinance to alter the rate at which single-dwelling
homes are becoming rental properties and to reduce the density
of people living within the area.
"We need to slow or stop the trend of the Highlands becoming
totally rental," Hyman said.
Hyman, speaking on behalf of the borough planning commission,
said the down-zoning would help to reduce density in certain areas
of the Highlands and provide greater flexibility in the use of
older homes for offices or other non-resident uses.
Diversity, the tax base and quality of life are some of the reasons
Hyman gave for changing the Highland's zoning.
The amendment would not change the current conditions found in
the Highlands, but only affect the possible new apartments available
in the future.
Undergraduate Student Government Director of Town Affairs Jamie
Klingler spoke against the proposed amendment on behalf of University
students.
Klingler asked the council to consider the students and their
choice of housing options when deciding on passing the amendment.
Klingler also said she is disappointed with what she has seen
as an "annual zoning-fest" by the council.
"Our protesting and petitions didn't work last year with
the student housing ordinance, and I'm trying to get them to see
that they need to take the student voice into consideration once
again," Klingler said after the meeting. "This is why
voting in borough council elections was so important."
Council member Elizabeth Goreham said students are not going to
be the central factor in deciding to pass the amendment or not.
"What we don't want is high density," Goreham said,
"and we want to protect this historic neighborhood."
Borough council will hold another public hearing on the proposed
amendment at 7:30 p.m. on Feb. 17 at the State College Municipal
Building. At that time, borough council can decide to table action,
give the proposal back to the planning commission or authorize
publication of its intent to pass the ordinance at a later date.
|