| Letters to the editor
Amistad should play in local theaters
This spring has seen a large influx of films in the local cinema.
However, one notable film is missing from the State College theaters.
Its absence is especially glaring in light of the observance of
Martin Luther King Jr. Day today.
This film has been nominated for four Golden Globes. And just
as Schindler's List somehow originally missed the State College
area theaters, now Amistad is also missing. In the Jan. 15 Collegian
article "Spanier, guests discuss cinema," Spanier notes
that, "seeing Amistad has changed the way he sees the African-American
experience." If you are interested in seeing Amistad come
to State College, please write:
Mr. Mike Lubensky, c/o Carmike Cinemas, District Office, 2206 W. 15th St.,
Erie, Pa. 16505
Hopefully, the Graduate Student Association or Association of
Residence Hall Students will jump in and fill the void.
Marc Bumble
graduate-computer science and engineering
Senior Class Gift not worthy of donations
There is a simple and sensible response to Meghan Marshall's plea
for our donations to the Senior Class Gift: To hell with the Senior
Class Gift. Why should we let the members of the Senior Class
Gift Committee decide how we should spend our money?
There isn't even any assurance that this gift idea was provided
by a student. Furthermore, the assertion that we can contribute
to the class gift "without taking a cent out of our own pockets"
is absurd. Our average $38, while not in our pockets, is still
money that could have been earning interest in our time at Penn
State.
Aside from the monetary issue, this whole "tradition"
of the class gift, while good in theory, does little to improve
the education of future students.
Thanks to the gifts that Marshall points to, our predecessors
have bought us a clock that rarely works, a shrine to commemorate
our eradication of a local species and a sign that most students
are unaware of. Now, we are meant to fund the HUB terrace.
The only thing we've learned in the HUB is that the food is overpriced
and would never fly at an off-campus establishment.
If the gift were used for something other than to provide funds
for the University administration's pet projects, such as enriching
the real experience of the University -- lessons from the excellent
faculty and, perhaps more importantly, our peers -- we would gladly
contribute to the cause. As things stand, however, we'd rather
not fund such an ill-minded "gift."
We encourage all like-minded seniors to join us in our rejection
of the class gift. Instead, get your hard-earned cash and celebrate
your graduation in a manner that future Penn Staters would appreciate.
Mike Joyce
senior-chemistry
Jonathan Kelble
senior-hotel, restaurant and institutional management
Golfer with disability should not play
As reported in The Daily Collegian on Jan. 14, in an article titled
"Cart Wars," the PGA Tour may have to give in to the
demands of the federal court system and the ridiculous Americans
with Disabilities Act by being forced to allow a handicapped golfer
to use a motorized cart during tournament play. If Casey Martin,
the handicapped Nike Tour player who is causing the dispute, wins
two more tournaments on the Nike Tour he will receive an automatic
exemption to play on the PGA Tour.
His ability to win two more times is very plausible due to the
special privilege handed to him as a result of his handicap.
The PGA Tour and the United States Golf Association (USGA) have
specific rules that prohibit the use of golf carts during competition.
Since golf's inception in the fields of Scotland many years ago,
it has always been a game that is played while walking. Walking,
not cart riding, during PGA Tour and USGA tournaments has always
been protocol . . . and should be continued.
The PGA Tour hasn't said that Martin won't be allowed to play,
he simply won't be able to take a cart. That's the rule . . .
and a good one. The PGA Tour and the USGA have the right to make
their own rules and run their own tournaments in any fashion they
want.
If Martin's inability to walk prohibits his ability to play on
tour then he should look for another job and not attempt to use
the court system as a vehicle to force private institutions to
succumb to his demands.
If individuals don't like the USGA and PGA Tours' policy regarding
carts, and they believe it's discriminatory toward disabled people,
then they shouldn't watch PGA and USGA golf and shouldn't attend
their tournaments.
I suggest the handicapped rights activists form their own golfing
tour and use Casey Martin as their poster-boy. These two private
institutions (PGA and USGA) are not mediums in which bleeding-heart
liberals should attempt to correct perceived injustices. It is
up to the prospective organizations to govern by their rules,
not the federal government and the ADA.
Brad Park
senior-turfgrass science
|