![]() Wednesday, April 2, 1997 |
Collegian Columnist
Cultural diversity: a noble idea that doesn't really workGeneral education requirements for graduation have taken a lot of heat at Penn State. |
![]() Kevin Gardner (kdg115@psu.edu) is a junior majoring in journalism and a Collegian columnist. |
Some say they should be reduced, some say they should be eliminated
-- I think I've even heard that there should be more.
Why do the engineering majors need arts credits? Why do the English
majors need science courses? Why would a journalism major need
gym class?
As far as I'm concerned, all of you can stop whining. The purpose
of general education is to make well-rounded students and citizens,
and if that's not what you want, then you should have gone to
trade school.
The biggest attacks of all, though, have been launched at one
particular facet of General Education: cultural diversity requirements.
Many students are upset that they have to spend their time and
their parents' dollars learning about someone from a different
background than themselves.
Cultural diversity, then, appears to be another of the University's
attempts to get us all to like one another. Along with "tolerance"
(the buzzword of the decade), cultural diversity is another chance
for Penn State to pat itself on the back and say, "My, what
wonderful, enlightened, brainwashed young people we're churning
out here."
However, the problem with that view is that cultural diversity
really isn't that bad . . . in theory.
I must admit that I had precious little exposure to people unlike
myself before I came here. I can only remember ever seeing three
black people in my high school (out of approximately 2,200), one
or two Asian people and no Hispanic people.
Therefore, I would be the archetypal perfect target for the mind-expanding
wonder that is cultural diversity. And in fact, I have gained
a greater amount of understanding of other cultures while at Penn
State. But it has come more from my cultural anthropology and
sociology (both for general education, by the way) classes than
from cultural diversity.
To fulfill my diversity requirement, I took Religious Studies
1: World Religions during my freshman year.
As an amateur student of other religions, the class really didn't
tell me a whole lot that I didn't know already. But I imagine
that it would hold vast potential for learning for someone who
had not previously studied the subject.
This scenario highlights a problem: If the class was general enough
to not really teach me (who had studied some, but not a whole
lot, of the subject matter before) much, then what kind of understanding
could it hope to bestow on the uninitiated? And if the class tried
to delve deeper (necessitating a narrowing of the focus), what
kind of broad-based understanding could be achieved then?
The answer is that there is no answer. Some cultural diversity
classes are so broad that their students barely garner any knowledge
worth mentioning.
Others are so specific that the term "well-rounded"
could scarcely be applied to those who complete them.
So there's the problem. Any appreciable study in cultural diversity
could never realistically be contained within the confines of
a 3-credit class. And the constraints of other graduation requirements
almost preclude the possibility of further study should one, God
forbid, desire it.
Penn State's intentions are the most noble. I think it's great
that the university wants its graduates to be the kind of enlightened
individuals of which it can be proud. Unfortunately, cultural
diversity classes seem to have little of the effect desired.
I am grateful to my experiences here at Penn State for opening
my eyes about a great number of things. This would certainly never
have happened had I not come to college.
But that just brings up another point: The only way to truly understand
people is to be around them and talk to them.
I learned about other people by listening to them, not by reading
a book.
Not that I'm turning into an idealist here. I'm merely stating
that while the University's policy on cultural diversity classes
looks great on paper to incoming freshmen ("Sure, this is
a great place to come to school. We want everyone to get along."),
in practice it falls short of its far-reaching goals.
Do I have a solution? No. But that's why I'm not the one deciding
what classes you people take.
I'm not sure that there even is a better way to do it. But isn't
that the spice of life? Uncertainty: It transcends cultural boundaries.
|
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
4/1/97 9:02:05 PM