![]() Thursday, March 27, 1997 |
Reader Opinion
Film student irritated by lack of interest
I am disgusted. I am a film/business student here at Penn State
University, and for more than a year now I have been putting together
a short, 24-minute film I have titled THE THIRD KEY.
In the past year, I have rewritten the script, from scratch, more
than 27 times, and I have spent my last summer "vacation"
working three jobs, 16 to 18 hours a day, everyday, for two months
to get the funding for this project.
I have suffered innumerable sleepless nights agonizing over the
logistics. I am the producer, director, cinematographer, writer
and sound designer on this film. I have given an entire year of
my life, every day of every week, solely to the realization of
this vision.
Why am I disgusted? Because in a school of 40,000 students, even
after extensive networking and advertising, I have gotten no more
than 20 auditioners, and have only two crew members whom I personally
approached with the responsibilities.
Of all the theater majors, film majors and actors who attend this
university, none of them are willing to sacrifice a few hours
of their "busy" schedules to work in the field they
have supposedly dedicated their lives to?
If you love acting, and you love film, start doing it! You are
not going to get a better experience than by working with a group
of people who make films, not because they want a good grade or
they want to graduate easily, but because they love film!
My name is Alexander Ballas, (aab132@psu.edu.) Contact me if you
want to be a part of the crew, if you want to audition, or if
you feel you can help in any other way.
There is no experience necessary, just a love and a passion for
the industry.
Alexander Ballas
Gen ed requirements limit student choice
I enjoyed reading Tim La Rose's column (March 21) in the Collegian
voicing his frustration with Penn State's requirement to take
"several thousand general education credits." Although
his figures are humorously exaggerated, I unfortunately believe
his frustration is justified.
I have stated in writing to the University before that I believe
it is concentrating too much on an attempt to teach behavior patterns
in place of skills. This is being done by forcing students to
take their irreplaceable time and money to complete electives
that are at best questionable in necessity and at worst a detriment
to motivation.
By wasting a student's time, they are reducing their effectiveness
to accomplish real tasks that their future employers will ask
of them.
Many students simply fit whatever elective they can in their schedule
just to meet the requirement and view the course as more of an
insult than a learning experience.
Perhaps if any course were eligible as an elective, at least the
students could develop themselves in a direction that suits them,
rather than one predetermined, and in my opinion, uselessly limited.
Although La Rose complains about being forced to take foreign
language credits, during my turn at the wheel of education I was
not permitted to take a foreign language as an elective, even
though I would have liked to, in order to communicate more effectively
with foreign businesses.
So while the University's policy forces La Rose to take courses
he does not value, it prevented me from taking those very courses
that I wanted.
I truly believe the University can do better and encourage faculty,
the University Board of Trustees and University President Graham
Spanier to reconsider the restrictive elective requirements or
eliminate them altogether.
Christopher Frame
Posing for Playboy can be rewarding
This is in response to Jennifer Domisicz's letter regarding Playboy's
"Big 10" pictorial and PSU's participation.
Since she didn't go into the whole morality issue, I won't either.
I do disagree with her trying to discourage our female students
from wanting to be featured in the pictorial.
I was in last year's "Women of the Internet" pictorial
and have no regrets whatsoever. In fact, it will help me begin
to make the right kind of connections for my future in the entertainment
field.
And so far, it has. I've had a great time with all of it and wouldn't
trade it for anything.
I've received thousands of E-mail messages from readers. Sure,
the initial reason was because they saw me naked in the magazine.
But, the majority of them were sincere and complimentary, with
interests in my studies and my education.
Playboy is not a magazine that exploits it's models.
Hugh Hefner's daughter, Christine, now runs the magazine and I
don't think that she would allow that kind of exploitation.
I'm a subscriber and proud to have a Playboy sitting on my coffee
table. It's a great magazine. Period. There have been many beautiful
women to appear in this well-known magazine that allows them to
share their beauty with the world.
There are also so many beautiful women on this campus who I believe
should be in it, too. It takes a lot of gut to pose. You have
to be confident to shed your clothes for the camera and a pretty
good business person to know how to make the most out of the experience.
In case you haven't noticed, many of the women you've seen in
Playboy over the years have used their experience to their best
advantage.
I know I'm using it to help market myself better and open doors.
I don't think the ad tried to convince us that it's our fantasy.
I've had many girls ask me how they could get in, so obviously
there's been great interest, or it wouldn't have been mentioned.
And the question should be, do you care so much about what other
people think of you, without knowing you, that it would keep you
from doing what you want?
All I can say is, if you want to pose, then by all means go for
it. But, if you're really that worried about people thinking that
you're allowing yourself to exploited, then maybe you shouldn't.
You need to be strong to stand up for your decision when needed
and to deal with those people who may whisper mean things behind
your back. I should know.
There's so much more I could say about this, but I'd be writing
a book. It's your choice.
Pam Luu |
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
3/26/97 6:39:07 PM