![]() Wednesday, March 26, 1997 |
Locked in the gym's closetGroup discusses the issues facing gay athletes, coachesBy KRISTA HAWLEYCollegian Sports Writer
Imagine a Saturday night at the Bryce Jordan Center. The Nittany
Lions are on fire as Pete Lisicky sinks his fifth 3-pointer of
the night. As he raises his arms over his head in celebration,
a confused Lisicky looks at the crowd. There is no cheering, no
screaming, only the echo of the ball hitting the floor. It's difficult to envision a forced, library-like silence at a football or basketball game. Screaming for the death of a referee, chanting "We are Penn State" and jumping up for a big play are a part of the fun. But for many lesbian, gay and bisexual athletes, competing in the sport they love means remaining silent. |
| "It's
not so much about heterosexism -- it's about sexism." - Sue Rankin, Office of the Vice Provost for Educational Equity employee and former Lady Lion softball coach |
The hostile environment that forces many lesbian, gay and bisexual
athletes to hide their sexual orientation was one of the issues
addressed in a Pride Week presentation, "Heterosexism in
Athletics," attended by about 15 people in Willard Building
last night.
Sue Rankin, who works in the Office of the Vice Provost for Educational
Equity and is a former Lady Lion softball coach, focused the discussion
on women's athletics. Rankin addressed three main points: the
environment in intercollegiate athletics, the experiences and
perceptions of lesbians in athletics and the ramifications that
result when a player or coach is open with her sexual orientation.
"Basically, that label (lesbian) has been used for a long
time as a means of marginalizing women," Rankin said. "It's
not so much about heterosexism -- it's about sexism."
Rankin began the discussion by having members of the audience
read examples of the hostile environment often faced by lesbian
coaches and athletes. The anonymous stories from athletes and
coaches across the country painted a painful picture. One athlete
was forced to drop out of school after her coach told her parents
she was a lesbian. Another was beaten by members of her school's
football team because she was a lesbian.
"You're at a game and you've got all these other people,
you know, not wanting to room with you or eat with you,"
Rankin read from an anonymous athlete's statement. "I wouldn't
say the gay issue was the biggest problem our team had, but I
think it lost games for us."
The silence of administrators on issues facing lesbian coaches
and athletes can add to the institutionalization of heterosexism,
Rankin explained. Having athletic directors show their support
at a pride rally or actively recruiting lesbian, gay and bisexual
coaches and athletes are steps that Rankin hopes will be taken
in the future.
"There's a long way to go, but it's hopeful," said Kimberlie
Kranich, a University staff member who attended the discussion.
"We have made some advances in sport. We have to know where
we have to go."
Rankin proposed structural, policy and educational changes to
improve the environment for gay, lesbian and bisexual coaches
and athletes. Currently, there are no organized support groups
for lesbian, gay or bisexual athletes and no openly gay or lesbian
Division I coaches.
Penn State has no diversity training program that addresses sexual
orientation for administrators, coaches or athletes. Rankin said
institutional changes, such as an "athletic department code
of conduct" against homophobia, have to be made to create
a positive environment for all athletes and coaches.
"I think it might go back to sexism or that men have put
this label on women's sports that you have to be a lesbian to
be athletic or to be into sports," said Nicki Hamilton-Smith,
political committee chair of the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Student
Alliance. "I think the only way you change that is to hire
new people, not necessarily lesbian, gay or bisexual, that understand
and support." |
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
3/26/97 12:11:23 AM