![]() Wednesday, March 5, 1997 |
Locals react to human-cloning possibilityBy JASON FAGONEand KELLY RUOFF Collegian Staff Writers When British scientists announced the cloning of a seven-year-old sheep last week, many ethical and scientific issues arose from the study. But even more important than the issues that arose may be the amount of people that took notice of this scientific breakthrough. |
![]() CNN--Scientists grow monkeys from cloned embryos Cloning: A special report CNN--Scientists defend cloning of sheep Church of Scotland--Should we clone animals? Collegian article: Sheep cloning sparks ethical dilemma |
In a world of scientific journals and jargon, studies are often
ignored by the general public. Yet, with the idea of human cloning
in the depths of the sheep experiment, many have taken a second
look at the scientific world.
"I think this had kind of made a big splash," said Esther
Siegfried, assistant professor of biology, biochemistry and molecular
biology. "This kind of captured people's imagination. These
are things that hit home."
Capturing imagination is one thing, but some suggest scientists
may take it a step further.
"It's been something that people have kind of made movies
about in the past," said Christopher Minson (graduate-exercise
physiology). "From a scientific standpoint, it's not that
far-fetched."
People outside of the scientific community may have outlandish
thoughts as to where the cloning issue may go, Siegfried said.
"I think some people may be thinking 'Oh my God, there are
people out there cloning 30,000 nasty dictators'," she said.
But developments similar to this have occurred in the past, Siegfried
said.
"The issues have been here," she said. "For instance,
there have been experiments done in other species that were similar
to this. They didn't work as well, but that never made it to the
cover of the New York Times."
The same attitudes could be seen in students. Some said they were
worried about the possible applications of the cloning technology.
"As far as cloning people goes, there are a lot of risks that haven't been explored," Matt Doty (junior-physics) said. |
| "
I think some people may be thinking 'Oh my God, there are
people out there cloning 30,000 nasty dictators'
"
- Esther
Siegfried, |
Others had worries of how far science might take this new-found
capability.
"(Scientists) could take the traits of a variety of individuals
and create someone or something that is uncontrollable or unstoppable,"
Eddie Gollhofer (junior-business) said.
Anne Marie Artioli (senior-biology) saw danger not in the technology,
but in the possibility of a scientific community tightly regulated
by the government.
"Eventually, the government's going to have to step in,"
she said. "That's almost more scary . . . the government
telling science what it can and can't do."
But government intervention is not necessarily a bad thing, Siegfried
said.
"The government is already involved in legislating what you
can and cannot do in terms of research, and that's appropriate,"
she said.
The possibility of human clones does not faze identical twin Rhiannon
Weaver (sophomore-computer science).
"My sister and I have the same genetic material, but we're
different people," she said. "It's the same thing with
clones."
The entire issue still has many developmental steps ahead, Siegfried
said.
"I don't think people should panic," she said. "This
experiment didn't happen overnight. Time will tell." |
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
3/4/97 9:38:12 PM