digital collegian
Wednesday, March 5, 1997

Locals react to human-cloning possibility

By JASON FAGONE
and KELLY RUOFF

Collegian Staff Writers

When British scientists announced the cloning of a seven-year-old sheep last week, many ethical and scientific issues arose from the study. But even more important than the issues that arose may be the amount of people that took notice of this scientific breakthrough.

story link logo
CNN--Scientists grow monkeys from cloned embryos

Cloning: A special report

CNN--Scientists defend cloning of sheep

Church of Scotland--Should we clone animals?

Collegian article: Sheep cloning sparks ethical dilemma

In a world of scientific journals and jargon, studies are often ignored by the general public. Yet, with the idea of human cloning in the depths of the sheep experiment, many have taken a second look at the scientific world.

"I think this had kind of made a big splash," said Esther Siegfried, assistant professor of biology, biochemistry and molecular biology. "This kind of captured people's imagination. These are things that hit home."

Capturing imagination is one thing, but some suggest scientists may take it a step further.

"It's been something that people have kind of made movies about in the past," said Christopher Minson (graduate-exercise physiology). "From a scientific standpoint, it's not that far-fetched."

People outside of the scientific community may have outlandish thoughts as to where the cloning issue may go, Siegfried said.

"I think some people may be thinking 'Oh my God, there are people out there cloning 30,000 nasty dictators'," she said.

But developments similar to this have occurred in the past, Siegfried said.

"The issues have been here," she said. "For instance, there have been experiments done in other species that were similar to this. They didn't work as well, but that never made it to the cover of the New York Times."

The same attitudes could be seen in students. Some said they were worried about the possible applications of the cloning technology.

"As far as cloning people goes, there are a lot of risks that haven't been explored," Matt Doty (junior-physics) said.

" I think some people may be thinking 'Oh my God, there are people out there cloning 30,000 nasty dictators' "

- Esther Siegfried,
assistant professor of biology, biochemistry and molecular biology

Others had worries of how far science might take this new-found capability.

"(Scientists) could take the traits of a variety of individuals and create someone or something that is uncontrollable or unstoppable," Eddie Gollhofer (junior-business) said.

Anne Marie Artioli (senior-biology) saw danger not in the technology, but in the possibility of a scientific community tightly regulated by the government.

"Eventually, the government's going to have to step in," she said. "That's almost more scary . . . the government telling science what it can and can't do."

But government intervention is not necessarily a bad thing, Siegfried said.

"The government is already involved in legislating what you can and cannot do in terms of research, and that's appropriate," she said.

The possibility of human clones does not faze identical twin Rhiannon Weaver (sophomore-computer science).

"My sister and I have the same genetic material, but we're different people," she said. "It's the same thing with clones."

The entire issue still has many developmental steps ahead, Siegfried said.

"I don't think people should panic," she said. "This experiment didn't happen overnight. Time will tell."

go to home page Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated - 3/4/97 9:38:12 PM