![]() Wednesday, Feb. 26, 1997 |
Milk drinkers may be gulping down future health problemsMilk might not do a body goodBy ANNE BOYDCollegian Staff Writer Milk. It does a body good, say some -- it does a body bad, say others. |
![]() Collegian Graphic: Non-dairy sources of calcium |
While the National Fluid Milk Processors Promotion Board is trying
to increase milk consumption among adults, some members of the
medical research and nutritional communities say dairy is not
only unnecessary for adults, but is also a poor source of calcium
that contributes to chronic and degenerative diseases such as
osteoporosis, cancer and heart disease.
Organizations such as the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine claim that the food guide pyramid suggests too much dairy
consumption for adults. Additionally, the Washington, D.C.-based
group is concerned that the Department of Agriculture, which establishes
the nutritional guidelines, is influenced by lobbyists for the
dairy industry, said Kathy Savory, outreach coordinator for the
PCRM.
With claims of near-political conspiracy on one side, and accusations
that research is unsubstantiated and merely connected to animal
rights groups on the other, young adults being targeted by the
dairy industry may not know who to believe, if they are even listening.
But the issue is not so much about politics -- it is about health.
And whether or not you've "got milk," you may not know
what you're getting when you drink it.
"We know, particularly with women, that we need more calcium
as we age," said Larry Muller, professor of dairy science.
The dairy industry and many nutritionists promote milk as a prime
source of calcium to prevent osteoporosis, but research suggests
the opposite is true. Studies comparing the diets of different countries reveal that the higher the dairy intake, the higher the rates of osteoporosis, said T. Colin Campbell, Jacob Schurman professor of nutritional biochemistry, an endowed chair at Cornell University. |
![]() Milk mustaches keep students smiling |
"One of the greatest thieves of calcium is protein, especially
animal protein," Campbell said, explaining that certain dark
green vegetables provide a better source of calcium because they
do not contain the animal protein present in milk.
Osteoporosis is believed to be related to calcium deficiency,
but people are not looking at the whole picture, Campbell said.
"The best way to prevent osteoporosis is through activity,"
said Dr. Mark Clukey, a chiropractor in State College, who also
said dairy is not the best source of calcium.
In addition to animal protein, caffeine and alcohol steal calcium
from the body, Savory said.
Nutritionists across the board seem to agree that certain substances,
such as the phosphorous in carbonated beverages, deplete the body's
store of calcium. However, some have no doubt that milk is the
best bet to combat calcium deficiency.
"I absolutely think milk is part of a healthy diet for adults,"
said Claudia Probart, associate professor of nutrition at the
University, who said the calcium in milk is more absorbable than
in other foods.
In societies where osteoporosis rates and dairy intake are lower,
there are many lifestyle variations, such as more physical activity,
which contribute to the different disease rates, Probart said.
"In our society, it's very difficult to eliminate one food
group and get what you need elsewhere," she said.
Despite the difficulty involved with changing a culture whose
diet includes a lot of dairy, the China-Cornell-Oxford-Project
on Nutrition, Health and Environment, a study done by Campbell
and others in 1991, suggests that such a change is critical, Campbell
said.
In the study, which examined why certain forms of cancer are more
prevalent in certain areas of the world, findings indicated that
dairy products contribute to the "diseases of affluence"
found predominately in Western societies.
Such studies have connected breast cancer to the hormones given
to cows, said Monica Ziegler, a wellness counselor at Be Well
Associates, 510 Fairway Rd., who advises people to reduce their
dairy consumption and replace it with other sources of calcium.
But Thomas Palchak, manager of the University Creamery, 12 Borland
Lab, said research indicating that dairy is bad is not sound science.
"That's a bunch of hocus-pocus," Palchak said, adding
that such information is usually coming from animal rights groups.
Probart said she would prefer that extra hormones were not added
to dairy products, but said she has not seen data connecting the
hormones used in cows to breast cancer.
Ultimately, it becomes a philosophical and cultural issue, Campbell
said. While it seems that humans have always consumed the milk
of other species, Greek philosophers wrote about the negative
implications of consuming animal products. With the advent of
Christianity, people adapted the belief that humans were at the
top of the chain of beings, he explained.
"I think the future of the dairy industry is not bright,"
Campbell said.
The picture is complicated, said Cheryl Achterberg, professor
of nutrition.
"There is varying information and we don't know all the answers,"
Achterberg said, adding that adults in this country should utilize
dairy unless they really know how to supplement their diet.
With so much contradictory information, Clukey said the issue
needs to be looked into more before government funds continue
to promote the dairy industry.
"Different people have different needs," Zeigler said,
"and you have to tune into your body and figure out what
feels best." |
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
2/26/97 12:25:19 AM