![]() Tuesday, Feb. 4, 1997 |
Collegian Columnist
Executive privilege shield no longer valid excuseI've said it before and I'll say it again: "The Simpsons" is the greatest show on television. |
![]() Scott Paterno is a senior majoring in political science and a Collegian columnist. |
Contained within the guise of a cartoon hides some of the most
insightful political and social commentary on television.
Case in point is last Sunday's episode.
The background was a corporate retreat, and Mr. Burns, paired
with Homer, were in a race to a cabin in the mountains. Along
the way Mr. Burns suggests that they should cheat, stating that
simply relying on their god-given talents was silly.
"Cheating," he said in a voice dripping with rationalization,
"is a gift man gives himself." The Democrats must certainly
agree.
Over the past two months report after report has surfaced regarding
the fund-raising activities of both the president and the Democratic
National Committee. Apparently both parties saw a need and a unique
opportunity to increase their fund-raising in the face of a strong
Republican Party.
The first such scandal involved the Lippo group.
Over a period of three years the president entertained lobbyists
from the Indonesian company at the White House, resulting in millions
of dollars of contributions.
The money was funneled through John Huang, a former employee of
both Lippo and the Commerce Department, to his new employer, the
DNC.
Huang raised millions of dollars for the DNC. Once discovered,
the DNC returned that money, claiming that "mistakes were
made." If only it were that simple.
The bottom line is that the president, and the DNC, sold access
to a foreign corporation, essentially selling American Foreign
policy to representatives of a foreign, and occasionally hostile,
government.
It is even more complicated than simple access. Huang was granted
a top-secret security clearance by the Commerce Department, and
received security briefings regarding China, all the while still
employed by Lippo.
There is another Lippo connection. Webster Hubbell, the former
associate attorney general who accepted a plea bargain to avoid
prosecution, was paid $200,000 for "undisclosed services"
in the time period between his resigning from the Justice Department
and going to jail.
Does this sound like hush money to anyone else? Hubbell knew too
much about the activities of the president, and was even offered
a deal from the special prosecutor for information, yet he turned
it down, took a light sentence, and pocketed two hundred grand.
In return for taking care of the president, Lippo received access.
Access is what this is all about. The Democrats controlled the
White House for the first time in twelve years. Two years later
they lose Congress, and it looks as though the president is dead
in the water. What do you do? You raise money and start fighting.
That would be fine if they had played by the rules.
One rule they absolutely violated was one that states that no
government building will be used for fund raising activities.
The Democrats apparently never heard that one.
Two years ago, strangely just after the Republicans took control
of the house, the president started hosting "coffees"
at the White House. Arranged by the DNC, these coffees were attended
by high-level administration officials and business leaders alike.
During the last two years, the DNC raised $27 million from guests
at the White House "Central Perk." In a press conference
last week, Clinton said "Mistakes were made," similar
to the "bureaucratic snafu" when he got caught with
his hand in the FBI file cookie jar.
The time has come for a reckoning. The president can no longer
hide behind executive privilege; he must answer for his actions.
The bottom line is this: everything we know about this president
lends credence to the belief that he will do anything to get elected,
including violate campaign finance laws under the guise of "community
outreach" programs.
The president admitted his mistake, but that is not enough. He
must now face the consequences of his actions.
I really don't like to do this, because I hate to give self-promoters attention, but I feel a need to clarify my comments regarding STRAIGHT. There have been extensive complaints from members that I unfairly characterized them as a hate group. |
![]() Scott Paterno's column about STRAIGHT |
Sorry, but I call them like I see them. STRAIGHT has said implicitly
that they do not encourage acceptance, but rather that it is their
moral obligation to condemn the homosexual lifestyle. STRAIGHT
believes that homosexuality is immoral and responsible for the
decay of society, according to STRAIGHT founder Darin Loccarini
and the Willard Preacher.
That sounds like hate and ignorance to me.
|
Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated -
2/3/97 6:53:33 PM