digital collegian
Tuesday, Jan. 14, 1997
Reader Opinion

Benefits should include same-sex partners

As a new employee, I am writing to express my concern and sadness over a Penn State policy I recently discovered. The "Domestic Partner Insurance Benefit" covers other-sex partners but is not inclusive of same-sex partners.

It saddens me to know that while I may receive benefits for my partner, many of my friends and co-workers cannot, because of their sexual orientation.

story link logo
Dec. 6 Collegian story about gay couples challenging the University for benefits
I also believe that this is in direct opposition to the "Sexual Orientation Clause" in Penn State's Equal Opportunity Employment Act, which states that employees will not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation.

And although the employee can still get benefits, they do not get the same benefits as their heterosexual counterparts.

I am aware that Penn State is looking at this policy, but as long as they only look and do not act, people will be without benefits.

I believe this is an opportunity for Penn State to lead the way. As this community's largest employer, they have a responsibility not only to their employees, but also to their families -- which come in many different forms.

In keeping with University President Graham Spanier's vision for making Penn State a more humane, tolerant and accepting environment, the addition of partner benefits for all who work here is a step in the right direction.

Tracy D. Fisk
Health Promotion Specialist
University Health Services





go to home page Copyright © 1997, Collegian Inc., Last Updated - 1/13/97 7:45:09 PM